|
Post by jinxx47 on Aug 28, 2007 13:14:06 GMT -5
LETS TAKE A POLL FRIENDS.. AFTER ALL WE WOULD LIKE TO BE FAIR
|
|
Mark
New Member
Posts: 5
|
Post by Mark on Aug 28, 2007 13:25:26 GMT -5
God no... Crazy bastard..
|
|
|
Post by jinxx47 on Aug 28, 2007 13:35:35 GMT -5
lol...these buttons are like the 1's and 5's...
[ Exalt | Smite ]
exalt being a good thing
|
|
chrzuk
Senior Diva
Howdy folks!!
Posts: 30
|
Post by chrzuk on Aug 28, 2007 17:15:30 GMT -5
OMG - no way!!!! Not him!!
|
|
|
Post by jinxx47 on Aug 28, 2007 17:23:43 GMT -5
lol..thats about how i picture him too...lol
|
|
|
Post by Kerisblade on Aug 29, 2007 10:23:40 GMT -5
LOL! Are we going to break the news to Statecraft?
|
|
chrzuk
Senior Diva
Howdy folks!!
Posts: 30
|
Post by chrzuk on Aug 29, 2007 10:48:42 GMT -5
I will gladly break the news to him!!!!! ;D
|
|
|
Post by kathie on Aug 29, 2007 17:29:12 GMT -5
Absolutely not! He needs to stay under his rock!
|
|
|
Post by clarkway on Aug 29, 2007 22:11:04 GMT -5
It sounds to me like you people are in dire need of Statecraft. He's quite clever I hear. It's been said he's a master of disguises.
|
|
|
Post by jinxx47 on Aug 29, 2007 22:19:22 GMT -5
no doubt now behave
|
|
|
Post by Kerisblade on Aug 30, 2007 1:32:09 GMT -5
It sounds to me like you people are in dire need of Statecraft. He's quite clever I hear. It's been said he's a master of disguises. I think he's here already whoooo! Better check under the beds and in the cupboards..
|
|
|
Post by Kerisblade on Aug 30, 2007 13:58:25 GMT -5
Now that's low. But I think he's here already, reading the boards in passive mode or had joined under an alias. Pat Chu screwed up if I'm not mistaken. At IYT, Jinx's link published there led to her userprofile which in turn leads straight to this board, not the other Jinx board for the general public. And on this site, unlike at Purr's, one need not join as a member first to read all the boards. Perhaps statecraft is at this very moment right behind us, looking over our shoulder :-)
|
|
|
Post by Kerisblade on Aug 31, 2007 0:00:22 GMT -5
Yep and the poll was just a bit of a jape. Still, go easy on the name calling dude :-)
|
|
|
Post by Kerisblade on Aug 31, 2007 4:47:23 GMT -5
No problem...
|
|
trip
Junior Member
Posts: 10
|
Post by trip on Aug 31, 2007 10:25:45 GMT -5
Hi Jinx, I found it after all, ignore my latest msg
Looks like this ones been decided, but it did bring to mind a question, do you have the 'ignore' feature here?
Hey, can we take a poll on my buddy sky next? I need my sky fix, without it I have no idea who shes been on the phone with lately, LOL
|
|
trip
Junior Member
Posts: 10
|
Post by trip on Aug 31, 2007 14:44:29 GMT -5
hey mr m. if you were replying to my post (cant tell yet, new to all this crap)---you know its just a matter of time before she gets here....in fact Im pretty sure shes already at one of these places --I forget which lurking around under a tricky new ID but Im probably wrong, we will see
hey Jinx, speaking for myself, thanks for not putting everyone up to a vote, LOL
|
|
|
Post by Kerisblade on Aug 31, 2007 19:59:10 GMT -5
Statecraft has 4 clear votes for him and 6 clear votes against. But he does have 3 votes for him on condition he "does the windows and dishes." Perhaps he is busily engaged in earning his keep? Does the grass seem greener through the windows now, I wonder?
|
|
|
Post by jinxx47 on Sept 1, 2007 0:56:38 GMT -5
"Poll Question: Should we ask Statecraftsie to join?"// What was the purpose of the poll? Clearly no-one wants that raving maniac here, yet here he is. I don't question allowing him in. Even maniacs can behave themselves for a while, but the poll? it was a gag..you notice no one marked<<id rather have laura here<<<< lmao
|
|
|
Post by Kerisblade on Sept 1, 2007 1:55:03 GMT -5
Ah. For someone to mark "I'd rather have Laura here", we would first need a poll to allow Allard to join. Lol!
Next will come MJ, Miss Parker etc until we reach the Queen. Wow, it would be like IYT all over again, lol!
|
|
|
Post by Kerisblade on Sept 1, 2007 16:34:47 GMT -5
Yes, I've seen. I don't know, but MJ seems a half-way decent sort. Towards the last, she was sociable enough..
|
|
|
Post by magpie-SSC on Sept 1, 2007 19:16:03 GMT -5
Hell yes he is here and everywhere , kinda like an orphan vulture , no where to call home..
|
|
|
Post by yo2peachy on Sept 2, 2007 11:44:48 GMT -5
Hi trip,, ;DYour a TRIP
|
|
Moose
New Member
Posts: 6
|
Post by Moose on Sept 4, 2007 12:18:34 GMT -5
AWW isn't that sweet, Statey loves you man. Maybe he should have been allowed to stay on the board a bit longer so we could have had a bit of fun with him. The poor boy hates it when we laugh at him.
|
|
|
Post by gm on Sept 5, 2007 5:53:27 GMT -5
AWW isn't that sweet, Statey loves you man. Maybe he should have been allowed to stay on the board a bit longer so we could have had a bit of fun with him. The poor boy hates it when we laugh at him. 1 for no no no no no .only because of his scurrilous untrue attack below the belt of the moonman. that kinda stuff we don't need. there are plenty of ways to argue ,put someone down etc. anyone from p&s at iyt know i pull no punches. but i was never attacked in that manner. theres no place for that or the person who writes such trash. i don't see it as a joking matter . where is the ignore button may i ask.thats the ony way to handle missouts & misanthropes gm
|
|
|
Post by jinxx47 on Sept 5, 2007 6:03:53 GMT -5
ingoring them and not reposting the same thing one is having a fit about is another
|
|
|
Post by gm on Sept 5, 2007 8:08:16 GMT -5
ignoring them and not reposting the same thing one is having a fit about is another just the same i'd like an ignore button if there isn't 1. everyone should be able to pick the company they wish to keep or lose. you have to make it harder for the multi id game et al. so hard in fact that a knave will know its just not worth it trying to skate under the radar. enforcement .we need an intelligence committee (no not applying for job) to keep track of comings & goings of undersirables. if we can nail say a double dipper asap that will surely discourage him & future attemptors. make them look for easier pickings on another site.just thinking out loud. gm
|
|
|
Post by meemoon on Sept 5, 2007 13:26:34 GMT -5
"ingoring them and not reposting the same thing one is having a fit about is another"/// I was having a "fit" because you posted his filthy crap instead of blocking it and guaranteed his right to continue this crap by removing my ability to delete this kinda crap. You also told me in a pm at IYT that you had removed him. You had NOT. Claiming you "didn't know the slanderous post was still there" is hard to accept since he posted it ON YOUR NEWS FORUM. Last night,I deleted two of my posts critical of your actions here because I wanted to drop the matter. YOU have re-called it this morning. Fine. Here goes: I did not object to you signing Statecraft even though I knew,and told you, he was here solely for the purpose of disrupting this board. When he posted his threat that this site would "fail" because you would not add a Christianity board,I only advised him he was "skating on thin ice".Run this board as you like,but it is my right,as long as I am a member,to point out your failure to protect your board members from slanderous attacks by freaks like Statecraft. You posted on Gamersandflamers that "one member (me,of course) had insisted you remove another member because he didn't "like him". Nonsense. I never asked you to remove that idiot;I asked you to remove the MESSAGE. Now that you've re-introduced this disagrement, how will you deal with it, ban me? Go ahead. Some people can deal with the facts,some can't. In any event,as I warned you he would if you allowed him to post his crap, Statecraft as succeeded, has he not?
|
|
|
Post by jinxx47 on Sept 5, 2007 15:59:44 GMT -5
re:I was having a "fit" because you posted his filthy crap
he posted it..i had nothing to do with his post
|
|
|
Post by jinxx47 on Sept 5, 2007 16:04:25 GMT -5
re:You also told me in a pm at IYT that you had removed him. You had NOT.
i blocked him3 ways..just because his name was on the rolls meant nothing.. i wanted to compare with new members
|
|
|
Post by jinxx47 on Sept 5, 2007 16:06:51 GMT -5
re: You also told me in a pm at IYT that you had removed him. You had NOT. Claiming you "didn't know the slanderous post was still there" is hard to accept since he posted it ON YOUR NEWS FORUM
i dont read all the boards everyday.. sat we celebrated my sons bd, sunday i worked 12 hours ..would of been as easy to message me and point out the board then trashing me on 4 boards for 3 days..
|
|